The UP Scorecard exchanges with sustainable procurement leaders

SUM'D members meet for the first time and present UP Scorecard at the SPLC Summit in Atlanta; provides opportunity to share insights with over 300 procurement and sustainability professionals across various sectors; open house event enables interested stakeholders to provide feedback and learnings

On August 15th, Single-Use Material Decelerator (SUM’D) project partners met in Atlanta at the SPLC Summit. This was an occasion to showcase the Understanding Packaging Scorecard and interact with over 300 procurement and sustainability professionals across various sectors, engage interested stakeholders in a fruitful brainstorming session, and strengthen the engagement of the SUM’D team through side events.

The SPLC Summit featured a dedicated panel discussion entitled “Beyond carbon tunnel vision: Navigating sustainable procurement of foodware and food packaging”, chaired by Johanna Anderson (SPLC). The session was kicked off by Etienne Cabane (FPF) presenting how the UP Scorecard can empower procurement professionals in the food service space and help businesses make more informed, holistic procurement decisions in sustainable foodware and food packaging. The discussion continued with input from Judy Panayos (Sodexo), Marissa Golison (Compass Group), and Hamzah Abu-Ragheb (Aramark), representing three of the world’s major food service companies. They shared insights on how progressive companies are assessing their foodware and packaging options, how the UP Scorecard can help companies during internal transitions to better foodware and food packaging, and how the tool has been used in practice to help address previously overlooked aspects and support internal decision-making. 

Panel discussion with SUM’D project partners at the SPLC Summit.

The SPLC Summit was an occasion for members of the SUM’D to meet for the first time in person (after many years of virtual collaboration) as well as to welcome a diverse and engaged public audience to an open house event. Participants were invited to reflect and brainstorm with a focus on the following questions:

  • How do you define sustainability for foodware and food packaging?
  • What are the internal challenges/needs to transition to sustainable foodware?
  • What are the challenges in adopting the UP Scorecard?

SUM’D steering committee members Cassie Huang (Environmental Defense Fund), Kyle Meisterling (Scope 3 Consulting), and Dianna Cohen (Plastic Pollution Coalition) joined and led break-out group discussions. The open house was a great success with lively discussions leading to new ideas for future tool improvements and collaborations. Thanks to everyone who took the time to join us!

Some impressions of the SUM’D open house.

We ended the day with some field trip fun, taking the SUM’D members to the Mercedes-Benz Stadium for an eye-opening sustainability tour. Our trip wrapped up with an inspiring artistic journey to visit Pamela Longobardi’s art studio to learn about the Drifters Project and how littered plastic objects communicate with us about the ocean’s declining health. 

SUM’D group visit to the Mercedes-Benz stadium to learn about its sustainability initiatives.
Learning about the Drifters Project from Pamela Longobardi at her art studio.

Overall, the first SUM’D group gathering was a great success, and we are already thinking about the next event for 2024!

Topics in this Article

About the author

Etienne Cabane

Etienne Cabane is Engagement Director at the Food Packaging Forum and is coordinating the UP Scorecard project. A materials scientist, he builds relationships and collaborates closely with stakeholders to develop and implement the UP Scorecard. Etienne hopes to raise awareness of environmental health issues and drive change through his work.
Related Articles

European Commission study on FCM sustainability considers the UP Scorecard

The Directorate General for Health and Food Safety (DG Sante) published a study on the sustainability of food contact materials (FCMs) in light of the planned revision of the current EU FCM legislation. The study identifies seven severe sustainability problems with current FCMs, outlines four policy measures that could address gaps within ongoing EU FCM legislation, and includes the UP Scorecard as a potential tool to support the development of eco-design guidance.

Chemicals of concern metric improved to use publicly available hazard data, guidance on chemicals in materials

The chemicals of concern metric in the UP Scorecard has been updated to use the Food Contact Chemicals Priority (FCCprio) List from the Food Packaging Forum, which prioritizes 1,222 substances that have harmonized hazard data showing persistence, bioaccumulation, mobility, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, specific-target-organ toxicity after repeated exposure, and/or endocrine disruption.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn
Scroll to Top